Skip to content

Righting Your Writing

17 July, 2015

Don’t feel confident about your word choice? Steven Pinker’s book, The Sense of Style, provides writers with useful advice about language and punctuation choices now acceptable in modern English.

Unfortunately, his early chapters, on structure and grammar, are hard going and not that useful if your interest is in knowing what’s OK and what’s not in modern language use. These chapters provide the logic behind language choices. But it’s like expecting someone to memorise the whole grammatical structure of a language when all they want to do is order a cup of coffee.

He lightens up the text a little by adding cartoons about language and punctuation, plus comical examples to illustrate how writers may unintentionally mislead. What we write is not always what we mean:

  • I enthusiastically recommend this candidate with no qualifications whatsoever.
  • After the governor watched the lion perform, he was fed 25 pounds of raw meat.
  • Guilt, vengeance, and bitterness can be emotionally destructive to you and your children. You must get rid of them.

If your main interest is to become more confident about using words and punctuation correctly, skip to the last chapter, Telling Right from Wrong.

Pinker, a psychology professor at Harvard, chairs the usage panel of the American Heritage Dictionary. Usage–how language is actually being used–is now easy to assess because computers crunch through huge amounts of  written and oral data.

The panel considers changes:  new words and phrases that enter the language,  others that are heading for the English boneyard. In Shakespeare’s day, apparently even uneducated people could follow the plot. Now, four hundred years on, most of us need notes to understand the details. Even punctuation changes with time.

Pinker gives examples of how a word’s current meaning now differs from the original:

  • Aggravate
    Original: To make worse.  His actions aggravated the problem.
    Common now:  To annoy.  His half-baked ideas aggravated the audience.
  • Crescendo
    Original: Gradual increase.  Her stellar career followed a clear crescendo.
    Common now: Climax, peak. Her career reached a crescendo when she became the CEO.
  • Momentarily
    Original:  For a moment, lasting a moment. We momentarily believed him, but later it was clear that he lied.
    Common now:  In a moment.  We’ll let him know the outcome momentarily.
  • Presently
    Original: Soon. He’s expected to arrive presently.
    Common now:  Now.  There are presently 100 people booked to attend.

Pinker  identifies words that often confuse writers. Some examples:

  • Bemused means bewildered, not amused. I was bemused by his outlandish actions, and I did not find them at all amusing.
  • Criteria refers to plural items, criterion to one item. He answered all the criteria for the job, except one, the criterion of being proficient in Pidgin.
  • Flaunt means to show off, and flout means to ignore the rules. She flaunted her skill in deep-sea diving, but the captain criticised her for flouting his diving rules.
  • Enormity means extreme evil and enormousness refers to a large size. While testifying, she appeared to be more fixated on her enormousness, which she said was due to stress, than on the enormity of her crime.
  • Hone means to sharpen, and home in on means to converge.  E.g. When honing my tai chi routine, I try to  home in on mindfulness.
  • Ironic means incongruent, not inconvenient. Pinker’s example: It was inconvenient when I forgot my chemistry textbook, but how ironic to forgot to attend the lecture on memory techniques.
  • Literally means in actual fact, not a marker of intensity. He literally blushed when he spilled his drink, but he did not literally die from embarrassment. However, some dictionaries now accept the intensifier, due to its growing popularity.


The term grocer’s apostrophe refers to the wrongly punctuated signs often seen in the greengrocer’s shop when plurals are used:  Apple’s on sale, potatoe’s reduced.  I am relaxed about this use. Some people whip out a pen and correct the wrong punctuation, to  apples on sale, potatoes reduced. I find the variation charming, reminiscent of a time when language was so flexible that even Shakespeare used different spellings for his own surname.

Changing punctuation developments may also move you to change how and when you use commas, semicolons, and dashes.

Final words

At the end of his book, Pinker reminds us that working out what’s right or wrong in our choice of words and punctuation is only a tiny aspect of language. Much more important in using language is the role of ‘critical thinking and factual diligence.’ Rather than nitpicking about how English is degenerating, we would do better to focus on creating a writing style that enables us to ‘enhance the spread of ideas, to exemplify attention to detail, and to add to the beauty of the world.’

Source:  Steven Pinker. 2014.  The Sense of Style:  The thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. Allen Lane.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. 20 July, 2015 10:02 pm

    Thanks for the tip on Pinker’s new book


  2. 20 July, 2015 9:51 pm

    Reblogged this on The Editor's Pen with Paul Vander Loos and commented:
    Points to ponder about our changing language.


  3. 17 July, 2015 10:17 pm

    As someone who loves good writing I’m afraid I find wrongly-used/misplaced apostrophes (apostroflation) plain irritating! Ditto the sloppy usage of ‘there’ or ‘they’re’ for ‘their’, and ‘your’ for ‘you’re’ and vice versa. At least the ‘apostrophobes’ (who won’t use apostrophes unless they’re sure of what they’re doing!) are honest and have the ‘humility’ to spare one all these irritations, even if their sentence-structure might come out a bit formalized.

    I suppose one COULD try to imagine that the “loave’s half-price”, “banana’s cheap” could be interpreted as ‘loaves are half-price’, ‘bananas are cheap’…..? But the “Bargain potatoe’s”, “Choclate crossant’s” used on their own really have no excuse, and just show what I call an arrogant ignorance.
    And to end up with a device whose manufacturers/programmers have deliberately omitted the apostrophe in its text-messaging characters spectacularly exemplifies that kind of attitude! I would be furious if that happened to me. [See blog: ‘Warning: Approach Apostrophes with Extreme Caution’ 14 Dec 2007]. And it can make one fear that this arrogant-ignorant attitude will then become normalized, so that even commas and semicolons etc will get obliterated, and we shall all end up with keyboards and devices that blithely lack any punctuation at all. Or – even – have had their shift keys for capitals done away with!

    Admittedly some mispellings/typos can be comical and endearing – well, I do these myself; though, if it REALLY mattered, like for a business letter or submitting a manuscript – or posting on a blog (such as this one!) – I would naturally always check these out in my near-at-hand Concise Oxford Dictionary, and do my best to ‘proofread’ what I’d typed.

    Quoting from the quiz in blog: ‘Warning: Approach Apostrophes with Extreme Caution’:
    “a. Is it Veterans Affairs? Or Veterans’ Affairs?
    “b. Is it the bees’s knees? Or the bees’ knees?
    “c. Is it Socrates’ death? Or Socrates’s death?
    “According to Pam Peters, the first choice in each of the items above shows currently acceptable use in Australia and the USA. Is she right? Are you right? Do you know for sure?”

    I know that I prefer, and would use, the first choices in a. and c., and would just use ‘bees knees’.


    • 26 July, 2015 9:21 am

      I’m with you re the 3 examples at the bottom of your note. I’m in favour of removing the apostrophe when a term has become part of a name, e.g., Veterans Affairs. Recently, a writing residential place here has changed from Varuna Writers’ House to Varuna Writers House.

      I try for accurate, modern punctuation. But putting apostrophes in the wrong locations, mainly on sales signs, does remind how punctuation and spelling was once quite fluid. The wrong placement of punctuation is so prevalent here in Australia that if I started going around correcting with a permanent marker, I’d never get my own work done!

      Your view that capitals may disappear filled me with dread. Living in a lowercase world would make me feel diminished. I was also dismayed when someone told me that cursive writing is no longer being taught in some places because children do all their writing on computers. I suppose they will be taught to write their signature at least, for legal reasons.


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: